This article, written by Solomon Friedman, originally appeared in the Ottawa Sun on August 29, 2015. It is a scene that repeats itself at the Ottawa courthouse on a near weekly basis. A person is charged with a serious crime. The arrest is well-publicized. Sometimes, the police issue a press release. More often than not, the local media is at the courthouse, monitoring the arrest and bail proceedings. In cases involving an alleged victim – as most criminal matters do – the victim’s family and friends are present at court, en masse. For most accused persons, a bail hearing is [...]
This article, written by Solomon Friedman, originally appeared in the Ottawa Sun on October 26, 2012. The range of sentences which can be imposed by a judge can be understood like a ladder of consequences – a list of increasingly severe sanctions, each with more serious implications for the liberty of the offender. At the bottom of the ladder - in fact, in some ways, before the ladder even begins – is the option of “diversion”. When an individual is charged with an offence, there are usually only two outcomes – either the person is found guilty (following a plea [...]
It is no secret the Canadian prisons are overcrowded. In fact, some prisons, such as the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre, had been using shower stalls to hold inmates due to lack of space. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that every person should be free from having their life, liberty and security (of person) infringed upon (s. 7), that every person has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty (s. 11(d)), and that no one should be denied reasonable bail without justice cause (s. 11(e)). The Criminal Code also states that there is an initial presumption that a justice should order the [...]
On behalf of Edelson Clifford D’Angelo Friedman LLP posted in Criminal Defence on July 30, 2016. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that “any person charged with an offence has the right… to be tried within a reasonable time”. When determining whether a trial has been unreasonably delayed, the courts have always had to balance society’s interest in pursuing charges to maintain the publics’ confidence in the justice system, with the accused’s interest in having the matter adjudicated as soon as possible.  The Supreme Court of Canada looked at this issue in R. v. Askov.  In this case, the Court came up with [...]
On behalf of Edelson Clifford D’Angelo Friedman LLP posted in Criminal Defence on August 10, 2016. On February 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada, in a landmark unanimous decision, declared that “prohibition on physician-assisted dying infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.” The case of Carter v. Canada, was a drastic shift from the Courts previous ruling in Rodriguez v. British Columbia, which upheld the constitutionality of s. 241 (b) of the Criminal Code. Section 241 (b) states that it is a crime to aid and abet [...]
On behalf of Edelson Clifford D’Angelo Friedman LLP posted in Criminal Defence on August 22, 2016. The Court of Appeal for Ontario has recently ruled that once a text message has been sent and received then it is no longer considered private. In R. v. Marakah, the Court had to determine whether text messages should be excluded from evidence at trial under s. 24(2) of the Charter. These text messages included incriminating details of firearms trafficking, which led to the accused’s conviction. In this case, the trial judge ruled that the search used to obtain the cell phones had violated the accused’s, Mr. [...]
Conspiracy to traffic 10+ kg cocaine
Impaired driving, Over 80
Possession of a prohibited firearm with readily accessible ammunition
Child pornography cases
Possession and importation of child pornography
Domestic Assault Charges
Domestic assault causing bodily harm
Fraud/White collar charges
All Charges Were Stayed
Fady took very good care of me, keeping my best interest in mind and supported me throughout the process. I am very thankful for his help and would absolutely recommend this office and specifically Mr. Mansour.
Excellent and precise communications skills. Very clear on what my position was, what the legal actions available were, and what his strategy would be to address the situation. And precise execution. He assured me of my rights and position every step of the way. Made me feel totally comfortable with my rights, and let me continue with my life. Highly recommended.
Fady recently represented me in a legal matter during one of the most difficult periods of my life. From the onset, Fady was professional, supportive and reassured me that he would do all he could to ensure a positive outcome, which was achieved. Thank you to Fady and team for your hard work and support!
Solomon is an excellent Lawyer, top in the field of firearms legislation. Would definitely invest time and money for his expertise. Thank you Solomon for first, taking my case and second, supporting a injured veteran.
The night I was charged with assault after a night out drinking was the worst night of my life. As a police officer, an off duty assault conviction would have jeopardized my career. I have worked closely with lawyers my entire nine year career. Either directly with Crown on a case or through cross-examination by defence counsel and after a few minutes of speaking with Solomon shortly after my arrest I knew his knowledge and ability to articulate legal principles were unmatched. He spent nearly an hour on the phone with me gathering facts and providing clear instructions. Throughout the process he kept me updated as to what was going on and I was extremely impressed with his handling of my case. Solomon did his homework on the accusers and witnesses and prepared an unbelievable defence which ultimately led to the charge being dropped on the first day of trial and allowing me to continue my career as a police officer. I’d recommend Solomon to anybody who is in need of expert legal defence.